The Actor's Dilemma: When Stars Collide on Set
In the world of show business, it's fascinating to uncover the behind-the-scenes dynamics that shape our favorite films. Today, I want to delve into a lesser-known story involving two actors, Alan Hale Jr. and James Garner, and their contrasting experiences on a 1959 submarine drama, Up Periscope. This film, my friends, serves as a perfect example of how the same project can be a stepping stone for one actor and a dreaded obligation for another.
Alan Hale Jr.'s Rise to Fame
Alan Hale Jr. was no stranger to the screen when he stepped onto the set of Up Periscope. By the late 1950s, he had already established himself as a versatile actor, starring in his own Western series and sharing the screen with legends like Audie Murphy and Kirk Douglas. But it was his role as Captain Jonas Grumby on the iconic Gilligan's Island that would eventually catapult him into the hearts of American viewers. Up Periscope was just another gig for Hale, and one that allowed him to showcase his comedic talents, which would later become a trademark on Gilligan's Island.
James Garner's Dislike for Up Periscope
Now, let's shift our focus to James Garner, a man who, by all accounts, despised his involvement in this film. Garner, known for his charismatic portrayal of Bret Maverick on TV, was under contract with Warner Bros. when he was cast in Up Periscope. In his memoir, The Garner Files, he didn't hold back, calling the film "another piece of crap" and expressing his disdain for being stuck in it. This raises an intriguing question: why such animosity towards a seemingly decent film?
Personally, I believe it's a matter of perspective and personal expectations. Garner, already a TV star, likely had higher standards and a different vision for his career. Up Periscope, despite having a solid premise and a capable director in Gordon Douglas, may have felt like a step backward or a creative misstep to him. What many people don't realize is that actors often have little control over the projects they're attached to, especially when under contract.
The Film's Reception and Legacy
Interestingly, A. H. Weiler of the New York Times seemed to share some of Garner's sentiments, describing the film as "familiar" and "undramatic." Yet, he acknowledged the cast's efforts, including Hale Jr.'s comedic relief. This highlights the subjective nature of art appreciation; what one person deems mediocre might be another's source of entertainment.
In my opinion, Up Periscope serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between actors and their work. It's a testament to the fact that not every role is a dream come true, and sometimes, even the most talented actors can find themselves in projects they don't resonate with. This is the harsh reality of the entertainment industry, where contracts and obligations often take precedence over personal preferences.
Final Thoughts
As we reflect on the story of Up Periscope, we're reminded that the path to stardom is rarely a smooth one. It's filled with roles that actors cherish and others they'd rather forget. In this case, Alan Hale Jr. and James Garner's contrasting experiences on the same film set provide a fascinating glimpse into the diverse journeys of Hollywood's elite.
